More than 500 mothers and babies died or harmed due to 'systemic failures' at NHS maternity unit

Want LBC stories before everyone else? Set us as your Preferred Source on Google

Hundreds of new parents and their newborns suffered potentially avoidable harm or even died due to “deeply embedded' failures Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust.

The findings came as part of a review led by senior midwife Donna Ockenden, which found leaders at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (NUH) knew there were serious issues in its maternity department going back years, but failed to take action to prevent more deaths.

Some 520 mothers and babies suffered potentially avoidable harm or death.There were at least 156 cases involving the deaths of babies, and six mothers died.

Of the baby deaths where potential or actual harm occurred, 94 were stillbirths.Some 62 cases were neonatal deaths shortly after birth.

Assessors found babies died from a range of conditions, including oxygen starvation, mismanaged labour, hospital-acquired infections and poor postnatal care delivered by midwives and doctors.

Read more: Starmer to secure legacy by publishing delayed defence investment plan before he leaves, as Burnham urges him to hold off

Read more: Public wants a Labour leadership contest not a Burnham coronation, poll reveals

More than 2,500 families and over 800 members of staff have contributed to the largest maternity inquiry in the history of the NHS, with NUH having already paid out millions of pounds in compensation and fines after being prosecuted for poor care.

Among those babies who died were Harriet Hawkins, who died “avoidably in 2016 following significant failures in maternity care”; Wynter Andrews who died in 2019 “after significant failures in care”; and Ladybird, whose parents were wrongly told to terminate a healthy pregnancy, the report said.

The more than 500 cases of mothers and babies were graded as 2 or 3 for harm, with grade 2 representing “significant concerns” and grade 3 “major concerns” over care.

Grade 2 represents sub-optimal care where different management might have made a difference to the outcome, and grade 3 is where different management would reasonably be expected to have made a difference.

Some 30 cases of potentially avoidable harm related to “massive obstetric haemorrhage”, and 12 reviews into babies led to major concerns relating to brain damage due to a lack of oxygen.

Looking at the catalogue of errors spanning many years, the report found failures in the monitoring of babies, poor CTG interpretation, a failure to recognise babies were in distress during labour and a failure to escalate some cases to senior doctors.

Assessors also found that some families who raised concerns with the trust were told lessons would be learned, and yet “similar incidents recurred repeatedly over many years”.

There was also evidence that harm was downgraded by the trust, with families told babies had died of natural causes when that was not true.“

Across multiple cases and over many years, opportunities to recognise deterioration, escalate concerns and intervene appropriately were missed,” the report said.

Experts on Ms Ockenden’s team found:– “Multiple examples where failures in neonatal care may have contributed to long-term brain injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes” in babies.– Leadership instability was a “major contributing factor” affecting the quality and safety of maternity services.

Between 2017 and 2021 there was “sustained turnover in senior maternity leadership positions” and senior operational roles.

– A “bullying and toxic culture” at the trust over years. The review team heard how some staff members were “specifically and consistently mentioned as forming intimidating cliques that were/are well known, but not confronted”.

There was also a belief in the “Nottingham-way” and “tribalism” among staff groups.

– Staff “reported experiences shaped by longstanding cultural challenges, including hierarchy, bullying (particularly by some labour ward co-ordinators), nepotism and aggressive behaviour”.

One member of staff said “bad behaviours and toxic culture were normalised; people didn’t even recognise it…(There were) entrenched ways of behaving that were unprofessional and cruel to women on labour ward.”

– Staff reported “a culture of organisational denial” over years, where poor outcomes “were regularly dismissed as ‘known complications’”.

– There were multiple examples of “poor telephone risk assessment” of women ringing in with concerns during pregnancy and labour, alongside missing documentation and a “culture of discouraging women to attend in-person”.

– Staff who worked at NUH prior to 2017 told the review team “there was a culture of not admitting women who were seeking admission in labour”. One staff member said: “There was nowhere for those women to safely go to, because they were perceived as bed-blocking on labour suite… honestly, when I worked there, it would be when they complained enough, when they complained loud enough…”

– Some women in labour suffered delays in being examined and there were cases where staff were reluctant to escalate concerns and transfer to the labour ward “due to professional cultures”.

– The “toxic bullying culture among labour ward co-ordinators” lasted years and resulted in women receiving inadequate care. Reviewers also found inappropriate use of the drug oxytocin to induce labour.

– There were delays in recognition and escalation of postpartum haemorrhage, as well as major obstetric haemorrhage, causing women harm.

– Incidents were “frequently graded too low” and closed, contributing to the “under-recognition of serious harm and limiting escalation to serious incident investigation”.

– Stillbirths where sub-optimal care was identified “were classed as causing ‘no harm’”. Staff told how “catastrophic outcomes” were recorded as low or no harm. With antenatal care, women repeatedly described feeling unheard, inadequately informed and unsupported when expressing anxiety, particularly in relation to reduced foetal movements or emerging medical complications.

– There was inadequate communication support for women whose first language was not English. Staff described racism and “racist attitudes towards black women labelled too loud, too demanding”.

– In postnatal care, some mothers with very high blood pressure or who were deteriorating were not adequately assessed and there were “failures in the recognition and management of the unwell or poorly feeding baby”. Some patients received phone calls when they should have been seen in person. “In several cases the consequences of these failures were severe and irreversible.”

– Managers at the trust were often thought of as “invisible, unapproachable and unresponsive”, they ignored concerns, bullied people, and were rude and aggressive.

– Staff shortages and “operational pressures” affected all areas of maternity. Staff described routinely working “beyond safe capacity”.

– Some patients described inadequate pain relief, with one saying “It felt brutal… traumatic… they were screaming at me… ‘you need to pull yourself together’…”The review also examined 17 babies and one adult who died and what happened to them after death.

It found “recurring examples of failure to protect the dignity of the deceased, including an early gestation baby disposed as clinical waste; dehumanising language by clinicians; and poor mortuary care, including failure to comply with legal requirements…”