China ‘enemy’ reference was removed from spy case evidence ‘to fit Tory policy’
The CPS dropped charges, issued under the Official Secrets Act, against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry a month before trial
A reference to China being an “enemy” of the UK was removed from key evidence for a collapsed spy trial in 2023 as it “did not reflect government policy” under the Conservatives at the time, according to national security adviser Jonathan Powell.
Listen to this article
He said Counter Terror Police and the Crown Prosecution Service were aware of the change made by his deputy Matt Collins, in a letter signed by both to the Joint Committee on National Security Strategy (JCNSS).
This would mean the CPS knew the “enemy” reference had been removed before charging the two suspects, according to Mr Powell.
Prosecutors have blamed Mr Collins’ witness statements for the dropping of the case.
A final draft of Mr Collins’ statement was sent to then-prime minister Rishi Sunak in December 2023, the letter said.
Read more: Prince Andrew 'deemed potential national security risk' over alleged China spy links
Read more: Why is the planned China embassy in London so controversial?
“Drafts of a statement provided to (Mr Powell) included the term ‘enemy’ but he removed this term from the final draft as it did not reflect government policy,” the letter reads.
The CPS dropped the charges, issued under the Official Secrets Act, against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry in September, a month before a trial was due to take place.
Both men, who deny wrongdoing, had been accused of passing secrets to Beijing.
Director of public prosecutions (DPP) Stephen Parkinson has come under pressure to provide a fuller explanation for the abandonment of the case.
He has blamed insufficient evidence being provided by the government that Beijing represented a threat to the UK at the time of the alleged offences.
The Conservatives have accused Sir Keir Starmer of letting the case collapse, but Labour has said there was nothing more it could have done.
The current Government has insisted ministers did not intervene in the case or attempt to make representations to ensure the strength of evidence, for fear of interfering with the course of justice.
Attorney General Lord Hermer said in a letter to the JCNSS that he was informed of the DPP’s decision to offer no evidence – collapsing the case – on September 3, and discussed the decision with him but “did not though intervene in the case or give any direction to the DPP”.
He said he did not share the information with Cabinet colleagues at the “express request” of Mr Parkinson.
“I was not consulted on the decision, nor would it be appropriate for me to have any involvement in, or objection to, the decision to discontinue on evidential grounds,” he said.