Watching a fare evader dodge death was horrifying - we need a crackdown, but at what cost?

Robert Jenrick’s one-man crusade to bring fare dodgers to justice was a viral stunt that hit on a very real sense of frustration. For those who haven’t seen the clip, the one-minute video saw the shadow justice secretary take to London’s transport network in a bid to confront fare dodgers - or barrier bandits, as I have come to (not so) affectionately name them.

Jenrick’s decision to square up to those openly flouting the law goes against a very British principle: unbridled passive aggression. We’re a nation of silent huffers. A country that chooses to side-eye those disrupting the status quo, with furrowed brows and an apathetic shake of the head, rather than addressing the issue head on.

But then again, is it any wonder?

Recent days have seen a man jailed for the indiscriminate killing of a fellow tube passenger with a single punch. Even Jenrick, while attempting to confront one fare evader, was met with what appeared to be threats of violence, to which he can be heard responding: "You what, you're carrying a knife, did you say?”

This week, during a slightly warm but otherwise mundane train journey, six unmarked ticket inspectors, wearing stab-proof vests, swarmed my carriage as it pulled into a London overground station. A man, seated in the far corner of the carriage, looked increasingly panicked at their presence.

These individuals weren’t dressed in standard British Transport Police uniforms. They were dressed head-to-toe in black. To the untrained eye - or even a tourist for that matter, this group could easily have been mistaken for police officers, complete with body cams strapped to their chests. Given the current backdrop of ICE raids in the US and an international crackdown on immigration, is it any wonder that this man, dressed in a simple t-shirt and shorts, looked like a rabbit caught in headlights?

So he ran.

Sprinting through the nearest train door as the group approached, it was a matter of seconds before the inspectors clocked the situation. The group stepped onto the platform as they prepared for a pursuit. But within a matter of seconds, the figure leapt from the far end of the platform and onto the tracks.

I could see the man as he crossed the tracks, placing his hands on the far platform before attempting to haul himself up. Then came the honk of the train horn. His t-shirt bellowed as a wall of air hit his body. The screeching sound of brakes. The screams from my fellow passengers.

Those sounds will eternally haunt me. I was convinced this man - a son, a stranger, and possibly even a father - had just lost his life before my eyes.

As the train beside us ground to a halt, an empty freight carriage provided a clear view onto the far platform. There sat the man who had just jumped the tracks, looking as pale as a ghost but very much alive. The relief I felt was indescribable. However, these feelings were instantly replaced by one question: are these really the levels of intimidation that we, as a civil society, are willing to stoop to in order to collect a £3.45 fare?

With fare evasion hitting what can only be described as epidemic levels - stats suggest one in 25 people are failing to pay for public transport in the capital - it feels as though public sentiment is shifting. A sense of injustice is replacing silent tolerance with palpable anger - and it's clear Jenrick’s viral video hit a nerve.

It united commuters behind a common bugbear at a time when the cost-of-living crisis has many in a chokehold. Those living pay cheque to pay cheque are haemorrhage money daily on a poorly functioning transport system - so why should a growing number expect a free ride?

I, for one, was insistent that this unfairness had gone too far. I was done with sitting back and accepting that barrier-hopping will soon become a competitive sport. But when a man choses to hurl himself in front of an oncoming freight train in a bid to evade ticket inspectors, it's clear we're approaching this all wrong.

The incident illustrates the extremes that accompany such a crackdown. But that crackdown can swiftly descended into chaos unless handled correctly.

A man who tosses a coin and decides that risking his life is preferable to facing six intimidating figures dressed in stab-proof vests, is a man plagued by fear. It's also a sign the system is doing something drastically wrong.

Now, I’m pulling a Starmer and preparing for a U-turn. I’m here, openly admitting that despite my frustration at far evasion there must be a better way. We need to tackle it at the barriers and not aboard trains. Giving London Underground workers greater powers and greater training - that and ensuring inspectors’ identities are made clear.

I'll admit Robert Jennrick’s MP-turned-vigilante routine is a reflection of mass public frustration and moral outrage. But when a mother comes milliseconds from receiving the phone call that every parent dreads, it's time to reassess.

Is a life the cost we’re willing to pay for a train ride? My view - and I’m sure one shared by every one of my fellow commuters that day - is a resounding ‘no’.

________________

Danielle de Wolfe is LBC's Senior Digital News Editor.

LBC Opinion provides a platform for diverse opinions on current affairs and matters of public interest.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official LBC position.

To contact us email opinion@lbc.co.uk