History could have been different says Southport inquiry chairman
Sir Adrian Fulford said that Axel Rudakubana’s parents were at fault in not reporting his escalating behaviour and state agencies failed to manage the risk the teenager clearly represented
History would have taken a different course and the deadly Southport attack stopped if the killer’s parents and state agents had acted sooner, Sir Adrian Fulford has said.
Listen to this article
Sir Adrian said his two “principal conclusions” were that Axel Rudakubana’s parents were at fault in not reporting his escalating behaviour and state agencies including those in health, education and policing, failed to manage the risk the teenager clearly represented.
Had they done so, Sir Adrian said it was “highly likely” the attack would not have occurred.
“History simply would have taken a different course,” he said.
“As I have already indicated but I repeat, this terrible event could have been and should have been prevented.”
Read more: Southport inquiry blames killer's parents for failing to prevent attack
Read more: Southport survivor pleads for round-ended kitchen knives to become norm
“While the sole immediate cause of death was unlawful killing by the perpetrator, the attack that led to the deaths was preventable.”
Sir Adrian said earlier intervention by schools, health workers or police would have revealed Rudakubana’s fascination with violence sooner and it would have been better understood.
He continued: “This in turn would have revealed earlier criminal acts committed or in preparation by the perpetrator leading to significant criminal justice and counter-terrorism interventions.”
The killer’s father, Alphonse, and mother Laetitia Muzayire, had failed to stand up to their son or set boundaries and though Sir Adrian recognised they had struggled to deal with him, they also bore “considerable blame”.
He added: “However, they had knowledge that he had purchased some weapons, and they knew he had tried to leave the house to carry out some form of attack at his old school just one week prior to the fatal attack, when there was a real risk that he was armed with a weapon.
“They also knew of empty knife packaging once the perpetrator left the family home on the day of the fatal attack.”
Earlier, the inquiry chairman said the “extreme and very particular depravity” of the killings was unprecedented in the UK.
Rudakubana was not suffering from mental illness but instead, from his early teens, he had been fixated with extreme violence, fed by spending the majority of his time online, unsupervised by his parents, viewing disturbing content.
“Over a long period of time, [Rudakubana] had become an aggressive, near-total recluse, who bullied and threatened his family and unashamedly lied to officials,” Sir Adrian said.
“One of the most striking conclusions from this inquiry’s extensive investigation is the sheer number of missed opportunities over many years to intervene meaningfully, which directly contributed to the failure to avert this disaster.
“Numerous systems that should have provided oversight, assessment and protection were ineffective or inadequately used.
“Some failed outright. The consequences were catastrophic.”