Premier League clubs 'fear Championship spending cap' ahead of crunch vote on measure
Richer Premier League clubs fear that even if they fight off a cap in the top-flight a similar measure may be adopted in the second tier.
Premier League clubs are concerned that a proposed spending cap could be adopted in the Championship.
Listen to this article
The 20 clubs in England top-flight are set to vote on capping the maximum spend on squads to five times the smallest broadcasting and prize money payout.
Some of the richest clubs are understood to be against the proposals - including Manchester United, Manchester City, and Aston Villa.
The Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) is opposed to the idea and has enlisted Nick De Marco KC to support its legal challenge.
There is also understood to be growing unease around TBA from the sort of middle to lower-ranking clubs who might, at face value, support a concept that would limit the spending of the big clubs.
Read More: Arsenal go three points clear at top of Premier League after Trossard strike sinks Fulham
Sources close to the discussion around the league's new financial regulations say "credible concerns" are growing among clubs as the vote gets closer, with the prospect of a similar spending cap in the EFL seen as a worry by some.
Relegated clubs in receipt of parachute money fear finding themselves "at the other end of the scale" in the Championship if their spending was suddenly tied to the earnings of the bottom club in the second tier.
EFL chairman Rick Parry has spoken in the past about the inequalities he believes parachute payments have created in the Championship, and would surely have to be an option for the EFL if the measure survived legal scrutiny at Premier League level.
Another concern for clubs is that threat of litigation around TBA. The PFA seems certain to act if it was introduced, with its lawyers having previously warned the Premier League it would be in "flagrant breach" of rules requiring it to consult.
There is also the very real threat of a club or clubs taking their own action under competition law.
Sources believe the anchoring proposal will be dropped before the meeting or fail to gain sufficient support in a vote, but there is much less certainty over whether clubs will vote to stick with the existing profitability and sustainability rules (PSR) or replace them with the new squad cost rules (SCR).
The latter are designed to bring Premier League clubs into closer alignment with UEFA regulations and have been on trial in shadow form since the start of last season.
At European level, clubs can only spend up to 70 per cent of revenue on squad-related costs. The Premier League proposal is to introduce a limit of 85 per cent for those not involved in European competition, with clubs going over 115 per cent, subject to sporting sanctions such as points deductions.
Opponents of SCR believe it risks creating a stronger correlation between success and revenue, with the feeling being that PSR aligns better with the three-year player development cycle for those who rely heavily on investing in promising players and then selling them at a profit.
A handful of clubs are believed to already be opposed to SCR, although the newly-promoted clubs may favour it.
That is because their PSR calculations will only allow a maximum of £13million losses for any season in the Championship, something which would in effect be wiped out if SCR was voted through