Skip to main content
On Air Now

Private schools’ VAT challenge thrown out by Court of Appeal

Share

Parents and pupils from a coalition of private Christian schools protest outside the Royal Courts of Justice during January's hearing
Parents and pupils from a coalition of private Christian schools protest outside the Royal Courts of Justice during January's hearing. Picture: Alamy

By StephenRigley

A group of private schools, pupils and parents have lost a Court of Appeal challenge over the introduction of VAT onto school fees.

Listen to this article

Loading audio...

Several schools, children who attend them, and their parents previously brought legal action against the Treasury, claiming the policy is incompatible with human rights law.

Three judges dismissed the High Court challenge in June last year.

The schools, children and parents then appealed, telling appeal judges in January that the addition of VAT would render the schools "unviable".

But in a decision on Friday, the Court of Appeal dismissed the challenge.

The schools, pupils and parents said the policy was incompatible with human rights law
The schools, pupils and parents said the policy was incompatible with human rights law. Picture: Alamy

Read More: Private schools could lose discounted Ofsted inspections under plans to end 'unfair' state subsidy

Read More: Private schools, pupils and their parents lose historic High Court bid to stop Labour introducing VAT on school fees

In a 44-page judgment, Sir Geoffrey Vos, Lord Justice Singh and Lady Justice Falk said that the Government had given reasonable reasons for not exempting low-cost private schools from VAT, including that it "would have serious detrimental consequences".

They continued: "We acknowledge that the measure may have a serious impact on the group one claimants if they are unable to afford private education which accords with their religious convictions, but it is important to bear in mind that they have the option of home schooling if free education in the state sector is not acceptable to them."

At the hearing in January, Bruno Quintavalle, representing Emmanuel School in Derby, and a group of Christian schools, said the High Court wrongly found that the VAT measure did not impair the very essence of the right to an effective education.

He said: "What matters for the present claim is that individual rights, not necessarily those of a larger group, whether termed 'Evangelical Christians' or otherwise, have been interfered with."

However, Sir James Eadie KC, representing the Treasury, HMRC and the Department for Education, said in written submissions: "A tax on an optional service that a consumer can elect not to use - a fortiori where, as here, the state makes the same service available for free for all children - does not interfere with the property rights of a person who may or does wish to purchase the service."