'The Principality of Piddington': Sleepy village votes to leave UK in symbolic referendum over plans for nearby migrant camp
A total of 92 per cent of residents voted for independence in the symbolic referendum
The Oxfordshire village of Piddington has voted overwhelmingly in favour of independence from the UK in a symbolic protest against plans to house 1,256 male asylum seekers at a nearby former military base.
Listen to this article
People who live there are furious and want to separate from the UK and become an independent state, after the Government announced plans to house hundreds of male asylum seekers near the town, which locals say will not be able to cope with the influx.
Some 285 villagers backed “independence”, with a turnout of nearly 92%. Only 26 residents voted against the motion, with one spoiled ballot recorded.
The result was announced by a returning officer to an audience of dozens of residents gathered outside the village hall this morning.
A pennant reading Battle for Britain 2026 also hangs outside the hall, alongside another commemorating the date of the Second World War military campaign, the Battle of Britain, on September 15 1940.
Parish chairman Tim McNally said this morning the vote gave “hope” to residents.
He said: “Yesterday was the anniversary of the Battle of Britain, and for us, it was the battle for Britain.
“We’ve been identified as ground zero for a whole number of issues.
“I just want to say something to Andy Burnham, the Prime Minister of this great, great country that we’re in, the Speaker of the House of Lords, Speaker of the Commons, Kemi Badenoch, who is the leader of the opposition and all shadow oppositions: this is an example of democracy in operation.”
"Your house value has dropped. We’ve had a number of house deals cancelled. We’ve had banks pull mortgages.
“We’ve had people who’ve got pensions in their properties have to be revalued, because the value of their property is no longer what it was.
“That’s not about saying this is a wealthy area, this is no more wealthy than any other village around the country, but people work very hard, and they worked hard to earn what they’ve made, and they should be entitled to have what they’ve made.
“But overnight, to have that destroyed, ultimately, is disgraceful, and we’ve had no involvement in that process to determine what it means for us.”
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told LBC this morning: "We are getting a grip on the asylum backlog, we are processing claims faster, we're removing people who don't have the right to be here, and small boat crossings are falling.
"But in the meantime, we cannot continue to ask poorer communities who've already shouldered most of the burden to continue to do that, and it is right and fair that we make sure that that is distributed across the country."
Migrants living at the camp will be issued high-vis vests and told to wear them for their own safety while walking on the narrow country lanes.
Residents casted their ballots in a small box outside the village hall, the community hub of Piddington, which does not have any pubs, cafes or shops.
A pennant hanging outside the hall reads “Battle for Britain 2026”, and another commemorates the date of the Second World War military campaign the Battle of Britain, on September 15 1940.
Herbert Owen, known in the village as Herbie, said the independence referendum “isn’t just about Piddington”.
After casting his vote, Mr Owen said: “It means everything our grandparents, our parents fought for – today is the Battle of Britain.
“This isn’t just about Piddington, this is about our whole country. This Government is destabilising our country.
“Wherever they put these people, in camps, in HMOs, or whatever, they’re ruining people’s lives.”
Mr Owen, 76, described Piddington, which has a population of about 350, as a “wonderful little village”, which has not seen much change since he moved there 33 years ago.
Piddington has been flooded with members of the media covering the vote, and dozens of journalists filled the village hall in the otherwise quiet village.
Mr Owen said: “We need the media to support us. We’ve got more publications and more TV than any marches, riots.
“But if the Government doesn’t do something, I’m afraid for the country. I don’t know what’s going to happen. I feel for the country, for the people.”
Mr Owen’s wife, Jennifer, said she felt villagers’ concerns have been ignored by the Government, which did not initially put proposals forward for public consultation.
“It’s like we’re nobody. The village is nobody, according to the Government,” she said.
The perimeter of the proposed site backs on to the tree line of a village green in Piddington, which is owned by the parish council and has children’s play equipment and a fitness trail.
Mrs Owen said she felt the site was unsuitable and had concerns about the safety of children and dog walkers who use the area.
She said: “I’m an old-age pensioner, but I fear for the women and the children in the village.
“They won’t be safe to go out in the village, not on their own, they’ll have to have their husbands with them.
“It will wreck children’s lifestyle, their livelihoods.”
Mrs Owen said most people in Piddington know one another and talk when they are out and about, or while they visit the occasional pop-up bar in the village hall.
She said the site would “change our lives forever” if it were to go ahead.
Asked how it felt to cast her ballot in the symbolic vote, Mrs Owen said: “Bit of sense of power.
“We can’t actually leave the United Kingdom, but it just brings things out in the open more for the country as a whole.
“All the parish councils in the country should do the same thing.”
Parish councillor Mike Nixon said the proposed site has no pedestrian access areas and the Government has suggested issuing asylum seekers with high-visibility jackets to keep them safe while walking along a busy road.
He said: “The nearest path is about a mile and a quarter away, down a very busy road that’s unlit.
“Their (the Government’s) own document says it’s not recommended that pedestrian access is used, so they’re proposing that residents would use the shuttle bus service from the site.
“And to further discourage them, they’re suggesting that should they walk, they would be issued high-vis jackets, and that’s the only mitigation for the residents’ safety.
“The road itself, the B4011, is a busy road, 50-mile-an-hour speed limit, but vehicles will regularly go in excess of that, so it is likely that there would be significant risk of road traffic collisions, injury, or even death, should the plan go ahead.”
Mr Nixon said the proposed site was prone to surface water flooding, has an inadequate foul water drainage system, and an insufficient power supply.
He added: “The site itself is wholly inadequate in terms of its infrastructure – so insufficient power, not enough water, no sewerage, prone to flooding.
“Apart from that, it sounds pretty good.”
In the travel plan submitted as part of the Government’s proposals, the site is described as having “limited” pedestrian access and travel on foot was “not recommended”.
Cycling and public transport options may be provided, the document added.
Rupert Lowe MP, leader of the Restore Britain party, spoke to members of the media outside the hall on Tuesday evening, while residents gathered at a parish council meeting.
He said: “I think what they’re doing is to be to be lauded, I think if we’re going to stop this, the people have to rise up and say they’ve had enough, and they’re not going to put up with this.”
Asked what his party’s solution would be, Mr Lowe said, “They should be deported immediately”, adding: “Worst case, we take them to an island offshore, build a tented camp, put them in there until they decide they want to go home.”
A spokesman for the Home Office said: “The Government is closing every asylum hotel, saving taxpayers over £1 billion on asylum support since the election.
“We are working to fairly house asylum seekers across the country, moving asylum seekers into alternative accommodation, including former military sites which are designed to be self-contained to reduce impact on the local community.
“As part of the process, we engage with local authorities and police forces to ensure the safety and security of those in the surrounding area.”