Taliban 'on killing spree of Afghan interpreters' after Government data breach put thousands at risk of reprisals
Taliban warlords have reportedly embarked on a campaign of killings against Afghans after the British Government lost a top-secret database of those who helped them during war in the Middle East.
Listen to this article
The Government spent two years using an unprecedented superinjunction to prevent the public from learning about the mishap, LBC reported this week.
It is currently unknown whether the Taliban has acquired the database of those who helped the UK during military campaigns against the Taliban.
Panic has set infor Afghans after they were told their their personal details had been lost in the UK's worst ever data breach which has put approximately 100,000 'at risk of death'.
However, suspicioun has started to creep in affter a man was shot in the chest by a gunman in an alley on Monday - one of three assassinations in the past week, according to the Mail.
The Afghan soldier - who relocated to Britain - believes his brother was gunned down in the street this week because the militant government has been aware of his involvement with the UK.
"If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault.
"There will be many more executions like the one on Monday."
The newspaper also claimed it has seen a dossier of more than 300 murders including those who worked with the UK and some who had applied for the UK resettlement scheme, the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP).
Among the murdered was Colonel Shafiq Ahmad Khan, 61, a senior Afghan intelligence officer who worked alongside British forces, and was lured into a trap and shot in the heart in May 2022.
Others include commando Ahjmadzai, who applied for sanctuary in the UK, and soldier Qassim, who were both killed in April 2023.
The leak of the so-called “kill list” put potentially thousands of Afghans at risk and forced the Government into resettling nationals to a greater extent than planned.
The Government spent two years using an unprecedented superinjunction to prevent the public from learning about the mishap, LBC reported this week.
Read More: Spies and special forces among 100 Britons included in Afghan data leak
Read More: Grant Shapps defends use of superinjunction to suppress Afghan data leak, says he would do it again
An estimated £7billion has been spent on cleaning up after the mistake. However, legal sources have claimed many affected Afghans are ready to sue and could be entitled to "five-figure payouts".
"The victims have been exposed to not just financial harm, but the real threat of violence and death,: Adnan Malik, at Manchester firm Barings Law, which is representing nearly 900 Afghans, told the Sun.
"In some cases, these threats have been tragically carried out.
Read more: Tory ex-ministers defend record as pressure mounts after Afghan data leak
Read more: Law firms chase £250k payouts after MoD data leak sparks legal storm
"Monies claimed will vary substantially between claimants, we would expect sums upwards of five figures for each person affected."
This could see the overall compensation bill pass £1billion.
An MoD spokesman said: "The Government inherited a deeply complex situation and since taking office, have taken appropriate action in line with the level of risk these individuals faced.
"We will do everything possible to defend against any compensation claims and any we do get, we will fight them hard."
While the events happened under the previous administration, Labour is now under pressure to guarantee that such an event does not happen again.
At PMQs on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer said: "Yesterday, the defence secretary set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited – a major data breach, a superinjunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
"Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen."
In February 2022, an unnamed Royal Marine working in UK Special Forces HQ, in Regent's Park Barracks, sent a spreadsheet to trusted Afghan colleagues.
The sender had thought the list contained details of 150 individuals who had applied for asylum in the UK under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP).
The scheme is set up to offer sanctuary in the UK to Afghans who supported British military operations during the 20-year war in Afghanistan.
However, the file contained the names, contact details, and, in some cases, family members of, not 150, but 18,714 Afghan asylum seekers. When family members are included, the number of people potentially put at risk rises to around 100,000.