Donald Trump wades in over UK energy bills, attacks net zero drive and urges more North Sea drilling

23 May 2025, 12:46 | Updated: 23 May 2025, 15:12

Trump threatens 50% tariffs on all EU goods and and Apple iPhones

Donald Trump has urged the UK to get rid of “unsightly windmills” and incentivise drilling for oil in the North Sea.
Donald Trump has urged the UK to get rid of “unsightly windmills” and incentivise drilling for oil in the North Sea. Picture: Alamy

By Shannon Cook

The US president slammed Starmer's net zero plans and recommends UK begins drilling "in the North Sea" - insisting this will bring energy costs "way down" and "fast".

Listen to this article

Loading audio...

In a post on Trump's social platform Truth Social, the US president said the trade deal with the UK "is working out well for all".

However, he urged the UK to bring down energy costs by stopping "the costly and unsightly windmills and incentivise modernised drilling in the North Sea" - where he claims "large amounts of oil lay waiting to be taken".

He added: "A century of drilling left, with Aberdeen as the hub.

"The old fashioned tax system disincentivises drilling, rather than the opposite.

"UK's energy costs would go WAY DOWN, and fast!"

Read more: Donald Trump slammed for 'crypto corruption' after hosting meme coin dinner at private golf club

Read more: Trump administration blocks Harvard's ability to enrol international students in move university calls 'unlawful'

Former Trump Adviser KT MacFarland breaks down the Oval Office 'ambush'

'Superpower'

The US president's remarks show a sharp challenge to the approach pursued by Starmer and Ed Miliband - Energy and Net Zero Secretary.

Starmer aims to achieve the net zero emissions target by 2050 and has placed an emphasis on the shift to clean energy at the heart of his leadership.

In its election manifesto, Labour pledged to make Britain a "clean energy superpower" and to get to "zero-carbon electricity by 2030".

The PM has said that oil and gas from the North Sea will be used during the shift to more renewables.

However, Labour pledged not to issue any new licences to explore new fields.

The US president's remarks show a sharp challenge to the approach pursued by Starmer and Ed Miliband (pictured) - Energy and Net Zero Secretary.
The US president's remarks show a sharp challenge to the approach pursued by Starmer and Ed Miliband (pictured) - Energy and Net Zero Secretary. Picture: Alamy

'Doomed'

Trump's comments follow previous statements made by Sir Tony Blair, who warned that Starmer's net zero plans are "doomed to fail".

Blair declared Labour’s approach is simply “not working” as he said people are “turning away from the politics of the issue because they believe the proposed solutions are not founded on good policy.”

“In developed countries, voters feel they’re being asked to make financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle when they know that their impact on global emissions is minimal,” Blair wrote in the foreword for a report from the Tony Blair Institute (TBI).

Downing Street has rejected the former PM’s positions, as a spokesman told reporters: “We will reach net zero in a way that treads lightly on people’s lives, not by telling them how to live or behave.

“Clearly there’s going to be a range of views but we are of the view that this is an enormous economic opportunity and as the Prime Minister has made clear, we’re already seeing the benefit.”

Trump&squot;s comments follow statements made by Sir Tony Blair, who warned that Starmer&squot;s net zero plans are "doomed to fail".
Trump's comments follow statements made by Sir Tony Blair, who warned that Starmer's net zero plans are "doomed to fail". Picture: Alamy

They pointed to the economic growth that could come from ditching fossil fuels.

“This is about the net-zero sector growing three times faster than the economy as a whole,” the spokesman added.

“We’re seizing these opportunities to drive growth, lower bills and boost living standards.”

Addressing Sir Tony’s criticism of plans based on quickly curtailing fossil fuels, the official said: “We’ve always said that oil and gas have a role to play in the future of energy supply.”

In his forward, Blair pointed to global trends which show fossil fuel use and airline travel expanding massively in the next 20 years, essentially reversing any progress made with climate policies.

“These are the inconvenient facts, which mean that any strategy based on either ‘phasing out’ fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail,” he wrote.

Trump urged the UK to bring down energy costs by stopping "the costly and unsightly windmills and incentivise modernised drilling in the North Sea"
Trump urged the UK to bring down energy costs by stopping "the costly and unsightly windmills and incentivise modernised drilling in the North Sea". Picture: Alamy

He argued there should be more focus on emerging technologies such as nuclear fusion, sustainable aviation fuel and carbon capture.

Mr Miliband said he agreed with “a lot” in the TBI think tank’s paper The Climate Paradox: Why We Need to Reset Action On Climate Change.

Speaking in the Commons, he said: “There’s a lot in it that I do agree with.

“It says on CCS (carbon capture and storage), we should move ahead, which this Government is.

“On AI and the role of AI, this Government should move ahead, which we are.

“On nuclear, we should move ahead, which this Government is doing.”

A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson added: “As the Prime Minister said ... the clean energy mission is in the DNA of this Government, because it is the route to energy security, lower bills and good jobs for our country.

“We have already seen £43 billion of private investment announced into clean energy since July, with businesses backing our plan to deliver good jobs for working people, including 2,000 only last week in carbon capture and storage.

“We will continue to deliver our mission to make our country secure and drive economic growth for our Plan for Change.”

The TBI has since clarified its comments, throwing its support behind Labour's environmental policies.

A statement read: "The TBI report is clear: we must prioritise technologies which capture carbon, place a bigger emphasis on protecting and enhancing nature, and develop new nuclear power, smart grids, and a new system of financing existing renewable solutions in developing economies.

"The UK government is already pursuing these, and their approach is the right one. "The report also makes a plea for a different international policy approach which focuses on the global sources of emissions and the additional solutions we are likely to need to meet climate goals.

"It notes that ongoing domestic decarbonisation efforts in all countries remain vital for reducing emissions and delivering a sustainable future. In the short term - and we emphasise short term - fossil fuels will continue to be a large part of the global energy supply, particularly in developing countries who need to meet the immediate and increasing energy demands of their people as their economies develop.

"The report is clear that we support the government's 2050 net zero targets, to give certainty to the investors and innovators who can develop these new solutions and make them deployable. People support climate action, and it is vital that we keep the public's support for how we do it."

Acting shadow energy secretary Andrew Bowie said: “It seems even Tony Blair has come to the realisation that Keir Starmer and the Labour Party’s mad dash to net zero by 2050 is simply not feasible, or sustainable.

“As Ed Miliband’s net-zero zealotry pushes this country’s energy security even further into the arms of China, and their slave labour supply chains, and risks driving up energy bills further and further, only Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives are telling the truth about energy policy in this country.

“Under new leadership, we have been clear that the cost of net zero by 2050 to families will be far too high, and we must urgently change course.

“Will Labour now finally be prepared to do the same, and put the national interest above their own ideological dogma?”