What does Google monopoly ruling in US mean for the search engine?

6 August 2024, 11:24

A Google logo on the screen of a mobile phone
Google Stock. Picture: PA

A judge in the US has ruled the company’s dominance of the search engine market is illegal.

Google has illegally exploited its dominance in the search engine market to stifle competition, a judge in the US has ruled.

The case has been seen as a potentially seismic moment for Google and the tech sector given its control of search and its related advertising business.

Here is a closer look at the case and what it could mean for Google and the wider industry.

Google headquarters in Mountain View, Silicon Valley, California
Google headquarters in Mountain View, Silicon Valley, California (Alamy/PA)

– What has happened?

In 2020, Google was sued by the US Department of Justice, which claimed the tech giant has abused its dominance in online search and advertising to stifle competition and harm consumers.

During the case, lawyers argued that Google’s monopoly enabled it to charge advertisers artificially high prices while also enjoying the luxury of having more time and money to invest in improving its search engine, an approach which impacted consumers.

For its part, Google dismissed these suggestions, arguing that consumers have historically changed search engines when they become dissatisfied with the results – highlighting how Yahoo had once dominated search in the 1990s before Google appeared.

But ultimately, after several months of reviewing evidence, the judge ruled that Google had breached US antitrust laws in how it operated.

– What did the judge say?

In his decision, US District Judge Amit Mehta said Google was a “monopolist” that had “acted as one to maintain its monopoly”.

US attorney general Merrick Garland said the “victory against Google is an historic win for the American people”.

“No company, no matter how large or influential, is above the law. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously enforce our antitrust laws,” he said.

The technology giant is widely expected to appeal against the decision, and the process could take it all the way to the US Supreme Court.

– What does the decision mean for Google and the wider tech sector?

This is the biggest question to come out of the case.

The decision by the judge sets up another legal phase where it must be decided what changes or penalties should be imposed on Google in order to protect competition.

The outcome of that decision could have a huge impact on the tech sector, as the changes could be as drastic as asking the company to dismantle parts of its online empire, or stop it spending huge sums of money each year to ensure Google search is the default search engine on the iPhone and other devices.

Or the judge could decide that only more modest changes are needed to protect competition and consumers, leaving Google relatively unscathed.

Any changes imposed would come at a critical time in the sector, as Google battles with Microsoft and others to lead the industry as it enters the age of AI.

By Press Association

More Technology News

See more More Technology News

A graphic of a robot hand touching a human hand

Experts ‘deeply concerned’ as Government agency drops focus on bias in AI

TikTok is back on US app stores.

TikTok returns to app stores in the US including Apple and Google

Peter Kyle walking past black railings holding a red folder

Rebranded AI Security Institute to drop focus on bias and free speech

A Barclays sign outside a branch

Barclays to hand share award to staff after yearly profit surges by a quarter

A bin of seized knives. A new AI tool from the University of Surrey has been unveiled which could help police forces more quickly identify and trace knives.

New AI tool to identify knives could ‘transform’ policing of knife crime

Former executive chairman of Google Eric Schmidt

Former Google boss warns of ‘extreme risk’ from terrorists posed by AI

A laptop displaying a ‘Matrix’-style screensaver

MPs: Ministers must give protections to creative sector amid AI copyright fears

French President Emmanuel Macron addresses the audience in a closing speech at the Grand Palais during the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris

Refusal to sign AI declaration was ‘based on what’s best for British people’

Someone at a computer keyboard

Airbnb issues warning over holiday scams fuelled by AI and social media

An HSBC branch

HSBC online and mobile banking working again after service outage

HSBC on growth across the UK

HSBC hit by outage as users complain of being unable to log on

The summit in Paris (Michel Euler/AP)

UK did not sign AI communique over ‘opportunity and security’ concerns – No 10

Sky Glass Gen 2

Sky unveils second generation Sky Glass TV promising ‘better picture and sound’

Technology Stock

UK announces sanctions against Russian cyber crime network

Participants in the AI Action Summit pose for a group photo at the Grand Palais in Paris

UK appears not to have signed leaders’ declaration at AI summit

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman

Sam Altman reiterates OpenAI ‘not for sale’ after Elon Musk-led bid