Computer expert never wanted to be revealed as Bitcoin founder, High Court told

6 February 2024, 17:04

Dr Craig Wright
Dr Craig Wright court case. Picture: PA

Dr Craig Wright claims to be behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, who is widely credited with creating Bitcoin.

The computer scientist accused of lying about being the founder of Bitcoin has said he never wanted to be publicly revealed as its creator, the High Court has been told.

Dr Craig Wright is facing legal action over whether he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonym credited with creating the cryptocurrency, and began giving evidence in London on Tuesday.

He is being sued by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (Copa), a non-profit group including cryptocurrency firms, who have accused him of lying and forging documents, something Dr Wright denies.

In witness statements released on Tuesday, the Australian said he chose the name Satoshi after being inspired by Pokemon but that he never wanted his identity to be revealed.

In one of 11 statements in the trial, he said: “Despite adopting the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, my intention was not to shroud this identity in secrecy.

“The goal was not total anonymity but a certain level of privacy.

“This allowed me to focus on my work and ensured that the spotlight remained on the innovation and potential of Bitcoin rather than the individual behind it.

“In my real life, I first shared my identity with a small circle of people.”

He added: “When I initially chose the pseudonym ‘Satoshi’, I was drawn to its connection with the Pokemon trainer and the symbolic significance it held in other contexts.

“The unexpected disclosure of my identity as Satoshi Nakamoto had unintended consequences, drawing public attention and speculation.”

The pseudonymous figure was the author of the document which led to the creation of Bitcoin, known as the Bitcoin white paper, which was published in 2008.

Dr Wright’s barristers have told the court he has the skills and knowledge needed to both create the cryptocurrency and write the white paper, which he began drafting the previous year.

He said in one statement that he was “proud to have played a pivotal role in ushering in a new era of financial technology”.

Dr Wright publicly claimed he was Satoshi in May 2016 after news articles were published by the Wired and Gizmodo news outlets about his identity in December 2015.

Despite being publicly named as Satoshi, Dr Wright said he resisted requests to publicly prove it, which he said was him “underscoring a decision to maintain a particular stance or principle rather than to seek validation or acceptance through demonstration”.

He told the court the stories “shattered” his privacy and that he “never intended” to be the subject of media attention as he “preferred to work quietly in the background”.

He said: “The intrusion into my private life and the subsequent public revelation of my identity as Satoshi Nakamoto left me feeling violated and deeply pained.

“It was a stark reminder of the vulnerability of our privacy and how easily it can be stripped away, subjecting our personal lives to global scrutiny.

“The experience had a lasting impact on me. I never intended to reveal myself as Satoshi in such a manner.”

Copa alleges Dr Wright told a “brazen lie” about being Satoshi and used “forgery on an industrial scale” to substantiate his claims.

One piece of evidence advanced by Copa is that the original Bitcoin white paper was written using OpenOffice software while the document provided by Dr Wright was found to have been made using software that did not exist at the time.

Dr Wright said in one of his witness statements that he used a “multi-software approach” to creating the document, which “naturally led to multiple versions, some of which may contain errors or inconsistencies”, and that he kept no record of when different versions were created and when other people accessed them.

Dr Wright is expected to give evidence over several days in the trial in the Rolls Building, which is expected to conclude next month.

The judge, Mr Justice Mellor, will issue his decision in writing at a later date.

By Press Association

More Technology News

See more More Technology News

Lord Alan Sugar

Lord Alan Sugar revives Amstrad brand with new marketing agency led by grandson

Jeremy Hunt

Hunt strikes cautious tone over prospect of tax cuts in the Budget

Police with drone

Budget to include £800m to cut red tape and free-up NHS and police time

The Spotify App is shown in an Apple iPad mini

Spotify accuses Apple of scare tactics over new EU competition rules

App Store app

Apple warns of increased security risks as it opens up the App Store in EU


TikTok refuses to recognise the fair value of your songs, says Universal Music

An electronic ankle tag

Home Office pilot that put ankle tags on migrants ‘breached data protection law’

Online Safety Act

Child sexual abuse image crimes logged by police rise by 25% – NSPCC

EA Sports sign

Games developer Electronic Arts to cut 5% of workforce

This super speedy acceleration makes "not an especially nice noise", with the journalist saying it is "bowel loosening".

Jeremy Clarkson brands supercars 'too difficult' after driving new £308k vehicle

A Google building

Inaccurate images generated by AI chatbot were ‘unacceptable’, says Google boss

An Apple store

Apple shuts down electric car project – reports

Sage sign

AI will ‘change nature’ of accounting, says Sage boss

A child using a laptop computer (PA)

More guidance needed on AI in schools, report says

Most influential Scots on TikTok

Gen Z ushering in ‘post-truth media age’, says former No 10 communications chief

UK mobile phone networks stock

Vodafone completes 3G network switch off