Pfizer jab recipients have lower antibodies against Indian variant, study suggests

3 June 2021, 23:32 | Updated: 9 June 2021, 05:45

The Pfizer vaccine does not provide as many antibodies against the Indian variant, the study found
The Pfizer vaccine does not provide as many antibodies against the Indian variant, the study found. Picture: PA
Nick Hardinges

By Nick Hardinges

People who have had the Pfizer-BioNTech jab have lower antibody levels against the Indian Covid variant than those against other strains in the UK, new data suggests.

The study also indicates that the level of antibodies against the strain lowers with increasing age and that they decline over time.

Researchers said this highlights the need for a vaccination booster programme for vulnerable people in the autumn.

The new lab data from the Francis Crick Institute and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) UCLH Biomedical Research Centre also supports current plans to reduce the dose gap between vaccines.

People who have one Pfizer dose are less likely to develop antibody levels against the Indian - Delta - variant that are as high as those seen for the Kent - Alpha - variant.

Read more: Pfizer and AZ jabs offer 'high levels of protection' against Indian variant

Read more: BioNTech boss: Pfizer drug likely to be effective against Indian variant

UK secures extra Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine doses for booster programme

However, antibody levels in isolation do not predict drug effectiveness, therefore prospective population studies are also needed.

The experts also said that lower neutralising antibody levels may still be associated with protection against Covid-19.

Currently, the Indian variant is believed to be the most dominant in Britain, with prospective evidence suggesting it could lead to more hospital admissions than the Kent strain.

Some 12,431 cases of the Delta mutation have been confirmed in the UK up to 2 June, according to Public Health England (PHE).

This is a 79 per cent increase on the previous week's total of 6,959.

Read more: Pfizer jab can be kept in fridge for longer than previously thought - EMA

Read more: 'No evidence' Pfizer jab needs updating to protect against variants

Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca: The Coronavirus Vaccines Explained

Emma Wall, UCLH Infectious Diseases consultant and senior clinical research fellow for the Legacy study, said: "Our study is designed to be responsive to shifts in the pandemic so that we can quickly provide evidence on changing risk and protection.

"The most important thing is to ensure that vaccine protection remains high enough to keep as many people out of hospital as possible.

"And our results suggest that the best way to do this is to quickly deliver second doses and provide boosters to those whose immunity may not be high enough against these new variants."

The study is, to date, the largest to be published that investigates vaccine-induced antibody neutralising capacity against the newest variants of concern in healthy adults.

Researchers submitted their findings to the Genotype-to-Phenotype National Virology Consortium (G2P-UK), the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).

Grandmother given guard of honour after receiving first Covid-19 vaccine in UK

The Legacy study is led by the Crick and partners at UCL and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH).

Healthcare workers and staff from the institutions have been donating regular blood and swab samples so researchers can track the changing risk of infection and response to vaccination.

Within days of having enough of each variant to study, researchers analysed antibodies in the blood of 250 healthy people who received either one or two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, up to three months after their first dose.

They tested the ability of antibodies to block entry of the virus into cells, so-called neutralising antibodies against five different variants - the original strain from China, the dominant strain in Europe during the first wave in April 2020, and the variants first detected in Kent, South Africa and India.

Data from previous studies suggest that higher antibody titres - the greatest dilution level that still blocks 50 per cent of virus infection in the lab - are a good predictor of vaccine efficacy and greater protection against Covid-19.

According to the research, in people who had received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, levels of neutralising antibodies were more than five times lower against the Indian variant when compared to the original strain, upon which current vaccines are based.

Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine ‘90% effective in preventing the disease’

This antibody response was even lower in people who had only received one dose.

After a single dose of the Pfizer jab, 79 per cent of people had a quantifiable neutralising antibody response against the original strain, but this fell to 50 per cent for B.1.1.7 (Kent), 32 per cent for B.1.617.2 (India) and 25 per cent for B.1.351 (South Africa).

David LV Bauer, group leader of the Crick's RNA Virus Replication Laboratory and member of the G2P-UK National Virology Consortium, said: "New variants occur naturally and those that have an advantage will spread.

"We now have the ability to quickly adapt our vaccination strategies to maximise protection where we know people are most vulnerable.

"Keeping track of these evolutionary changes is essential for us to retain control over the pandemic and return to normality."

The Research Letter published in The Lancet states: "These data, together with epidemiological data of B.1.617.2 growth, raise the possibility that this VOC (variant of concern) presents a dual challenge of reduced vaccine efficacy akin to the B.1.351 VOC, and increased transmissibility beyond the B.1.1.7 VOC."

Eleanor Riley, professor of immunology and infectious disease, University of Edinburgh, said: "These data cannot tell us whether the vaccine will be any less effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalisation and death; we need to wait for the actual data on these outcomes."