Hair salon ordered to close for 'causing distress to the public' in lockdown

30 November 2020, 15:12

Quinn Blakey Hairdressing in Bradford
Quinn Blakey Hairdressing in Bradford. Picture: Google

By Maddie Goodfellow

Magistrates have ordered the closure of a hair salon and said its owner has caused "distress to the public" by repeatedly opening to customers during lockdown.

Sinead Quinn, owner of Quinn Blakey Hairdressing in Oakenshaw, near Bradford, did not appear at Bradford Magistrates' Court for the hearing on Monday.

The closure application went ahead in her absence, with magistrates making the order to close the salon until just after midnight on Wednesday "to prevent nuisance to members of the public and to safeguard public health".

Kirklees Council has issued Ms Quinn with fixed penalty notices totalling £17,000 for trading during lockdown and served the closure notice on Saturday.

The court heard that she had been observed serving customers on six days during the current national lockdown in England, and numerous complaints had been made to the council by members of the public.

Hairdressers were required to close from 5 November under national lockdown restrictions.

Read more: 'Even though livelihoods are at risk we need stricter lockdown rules,' caller tells LBC

Read more: Environment secretary tells LBC Scotch eggs are a substantial meal

Tahir Hanif, representing the council at Monday's half-hour hearing, said Ms Quinn had refused to open the door to engage with enforcement officers.

He said she had mentioned Magna Carta, telling council officers that coronavirus legislation "does not apply to her and she does not consent to abide by these particular regulations".

He said the conversations were recorded and posted on the hair salon's Instagram page, "which received notoriety".

Mr Hanif said the fixed penalty notices "seemed to have no impact" and Ms Quinn was given a "final opportunity" to comply last week but she continued to open.

Chairwoman of the bench Rebecca Todd said she had concerns about the timing of the closure application, due to lockdown regulations coming to an end on December 2.

Mr Hanif said it was accepted that the application should have been made sooner but said it was a "last resort" after Kirklees Council's attempts to engage with Ms Quinn were unsuccessful and complaints increased.

He said: "A decision was taken, notwithstanding the short period of time, a message had to be sent that this type of behaviour will not be acceptable."

Ms Todd said: "While we still have real concerns regarding the timing of this application, we are satisfied on balance that the order is necessary.

"We think it is necessary to prevent nuisance to members of the public and to safeguard public health.

"She is continuing in her behaviour, which is causing distress to the public in an already stressful and disturbing time."

The closure order means that anyone entering the premises could be arrested and fined or given a maximum prison sentence of 51 weeks.

On Saturday, Kirklees Council cabinet member Paul Davies said: "The actions taken by this business owner, and those who have given her custom during this period, have been illegal, selfish and reckless.

"The business owner has wilfully endangered herself, her customers, the wider community and our staff.

"We don't want to fine our businesses or take action like this against them, particularly after such a difficult year. However, we have given this business every opportunity to do the right thing and public health must come first. We have been left with no choice."