Rwanda scheme could cost taxpayer more than £500m, watchdog report finds
1 March 2024, 01:17 | Updated: 1 March 2024, 01:21
Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda Bill could cost the taxpayer more than £500m, a watchdog report has revealed.
Listen to this article
Loading audio...
The report from the National Audit Office (NAO) has revealed the Government's flagship bill could cost the taxpayer a total of £576.8m if just 300 asylum seekers are sent to Rwanda.
This would amount to around £1.8m million per person sent to the east African nation and account for just 1% of the UK’s asylum seekers, according to the National Audit Office.
No asylum seekers who have arrived in the UK by unauthorised means have been removed to Rwanda under the Tory policy as of yet.
The bill has faced a series of legal challenges in recent months, but the Prime Minister has said he wants flights to start "as soon as practically possible".
The NAO investigated the Rwanda plan's costs between January and February after the chairs of the Public Accounts and Home Affairs committees raised concerns about the lack of information available to Parliament.
Previously, the Home Office has refused to reveal the full costs of the deal due to “commercial confidentiality”.
So far, the Government has paid Kigali £220 million under the Economic Transformation and Integration Fund designed to support Rwanda's growth.
It will fork out another £50 million to Rwanda this year and every April after until 2026.
The report also found that in addition to the £220 million already paid to Kigali, the Home Office will also spend up to an additional £150,000 per individual relocated to Rwanda for 'processing and operational costs'.
These fees will be split into annual sums that will be paid for up to five years, meaning it could bring the total figure spent on each person up to £150,000 by the end of the five-year period.
The initial five-year deal runs to April 2027, meaning payments could potentially continue until 2033.
If an individual decides to leave Rwanda, the UK would stop payments for that person but still give Rwanda a one-off £10,000 to assist with their departure.
The Home Office has estimated that one in 10 will voluntarily leave Rwanda after being relocated.
Labour has hit out at the report as a “national scandal”, as shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: "This report reveals the national scandal the Tories have been trying to hide. Its shocking analysis shows the costs of the failed Rwanda farce are even higher than previously thought.
"In order to send less than 1% of UK asylum seekers to Rwanda on a few symbolic flights, the taxpayer will be forced to fork out over half a billion pounds - with no ability to recover any of the money already sent. This is the equivalent of nearly £2 million per person sent.
"Rishi Sunak has staked his position on this scheme. He must account for this fiasco."
Key figures
- Flying migrants to Rwanda will cost £11,000 - covering the charter of possible non-commercial planes and fuel costs
- The Government has promised to pay an additional £50m to Rwanda in April 2024, 2025 and 2026
- Once the first 300 migrants have been relocated to Rwanda, ministers have agreed to put another £120 million into the fund, lifting the total to £490 million
- Combined with other additional costs, this lists the overall sum to £541m, which works out as £1.8m per asylum seeker
Reacting to the watchdog’s report on Friday, critics have slammed the Home Office over the "staggering figures".
Home Affairs Committee chairwoman Dame Diana Johnson said: "These are staggering figures. For all its rhetoric about ensuring value for money in the asylum and immigration system it is unclear how schemes such as Rwanda or Bibby Stockholm achieve that. Huge initial outlay and ongoing costs raise serious questions about how this can be cost-effective, even compared to high hotel accommodation costs.
"What we are left with is a very expensive programme the Government hopes may offer a deterrent to those seeking to cross the Channel in small boats. Yet, there is little evidence for this either.
"This also does little to allay the serious concerns ... about the lack of openness on the cost implications of the Rwanda scheme from the Home Office. For a scheme whose importance is apparently self-evident, we would expect the evidence base to be far clearer, not presented in dribs and drabs and getting worse every time."
A Home Office spokesperson said: "It is vital we respond to illegal migration with bold, long-term solutions. Our Partnership with Rwanda offers just that.
"Doing nothing is not without significant costs. Unless we act, the cost of housing asylum seekers is set to reach £11 billion per year by 2026. Illegal migration costs lives and perpetuates human trafficking, and it is therefore right that we fund solutions to break this unsustainable cycle.
"We have a strong relationship with Rwanda and both sides remain absolutely determined to deliver on this Partnership. Once the Safety of Rwanda Bill and Treaty are in place, we will focus on getting flights off the ground."
