Home Office loses bid to keep Apple legal challenge private

7 April 2025, 15:14

A message on an iPhone in London warning that Apple can no longer offer Advanced Data Protection to its customers in the UK
Apple removes data protection. Picture: PA

The iPhone maker has filed a claim at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, judges said on Monday.

The Home Office has lost a bid to keep legal action brought by Apple against the Government private.

Last month, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, a specialist tribunal which deals with allegations of unlawful intrusion and some national security matters, sat behind closed doors for an all-day hearing where the identities of the parties involved were not publicly known.

Multiple media organisations, including the PA news agency, asked the tribunal to confirm who was taking part in the hearing on March 14 and to sit in public.

Neither journalists nor legal representatives on behalf of the media were allowed into the hearing, and the identities of the parties involved were not disclosed.

However, in a public judgment on Monday, judges at the tribunal said the case relates to legal action brought against the Home Office by Apple over the power to make technical capability notices under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016.

We do not accept that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security

Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Johnson

In a nine-page ruling, Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Johnson said that “bare details”, including the identities of the parties, could be made public after a request from the Home Office that they remain private.

Lawyers for the Home Office told the hearing in March that it would be damaging to national security if the fact of the claim, or details, were published, the judges said.

They continued: “We do not accept that the revelation of the bare details of the case would be damaging to the public interest or prejudicial to national security.”

Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Johnson later said it could be possible “for some or all future hearings to incorporate a public element, with or without reporting restrictions” but that could not be decided at this stage.

It was previously reported that Apple was bringing legal action over the UK Government’s request to access data covered by Apple’s Advanced Data Protection (ADP).

The Apple store on Regent Street, London
The ADP is an opt-in tool on Apple’s iCloud service (Victoria Jones/PA)

The ADP is an opt-in tool on Apple’s iCloud service which meant only an account holder could access the “majority” of file types such as photos or notes, as they were end-to-end encrypted – meaning even Apple cannot access them.

The Government issued an order under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, asking for the ability to access this data from Apple users, according to reports.

The iPhone maker subsequently said that it was withdrawing the tool from use in the UK, turning it off as an option for those not already using it, and will introduce a process to move existing users away from it.

Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Johnson said that neither Apple or the Home Office had confirmed or denied that these reports were accurate.

“This judgment should not be taken as an indication that the media reporting is or is not accurate,” the judges added.

Following the ruling, a Home Office spokesperson said: “We do not comment on legal proceedings. Nor do we comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of individual notices.

“The Government’s first priority is to keep people safe. There are longstanding and targeted investigatory powers that allow the authorities to investigate terrorists, paedophiles and the most serious criminals and they are subject to robust safeguards including judicial authorisations and oversight to protect people’s privacy.

“Those powers have saved lives, prevented incredibly serious terrorist plots against the UK, and put dangerous criminals behind bars.

“We have made clear that those targeted investigatory powers alongside strong judicial safeguards must be sustained as technology changes, as they continue to be essential to keeping our country safe.

“Technology companies need be able to innovate and improve security, but unilateral moves which prevent investigations into terrorism or serious child abuse put public safety at grave risk. These powers are purely about preventing serious crime and pursuing criminals, and do not affect our commitment to free speech.

“The Investigatory Powers Act and Technical Capability Notices allow the UK to maintain existing and long standing counter-terrorism and serious crime investigative capabilities in the face of fast changing technology, especially when we know that terrorists and child abusers organise and seek to hide evidence of their crimes online.

“TCNs themselves do not directly provide access to data – relevant targeted warrants and authorisations must also be in place. Nor do TCNs extend powers to obtain access to data; their purpose is to ensure that those existing powers can continue to be exercised effectively.

“The Government believes both in protecting privacy and in ensuring that the most serious crimes and terror threats can be investigated or stopped. Let us be clear: any suggestion that this is a binary choice between public safety and privacy is incorrect. We can, and must, have both. “

By Press Association

More Technology News

See more More Technology News

People ride an upward escalator next to the Dior store at the Icon Siam shopping mall on June 12, 2024 in Bangkok, Thailand.

Luxury fashion giant Dior latest high-profile retailer to be hit by cyber attack as customer data accessed

A plane spotter with binoculars from behind watching a British Airways plane landing

‘Flying taxis’ could appear in UK skies as early as 2028, minister says

Apple App Store

Take on Apple and Google to boost UK economy, think tank says

A survey of more than 1,000 employers found that around one in eight thought AI would give them a competitive edge and would lead to fewer staff.

One in three employers believe AI will boost productivity, research finds

Hands on a laptop showing an AI search

One in three employers believe AI will boost productivity, research finds

Music creators and politicians take part in a protest calling on the Government to ditch plans to allow AI tech firms to steal their work without payment or permission opposite the Houses of Parliament in London.

Creatives face a 'kind-of apocalyptic moment’ over AI concerns, minister says

Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary on Lake Victoria, Uganda

Chimps use medicinal plants to treat each other's wounds and practice 'self-care' as scientists hail fascinating discovery

Close up of a person's hands on the laptop keyboard

Ofcom investigating pornography site over alleged Online Safety Act breaches

The Monzo app on a smartphone

Monzo customers can cancel bank transfers if they quickly spot an error

Co-op sign

Co-op to re-stock empty shelves as it recovers from major hack

The study said that it was often too easy for adult strangers to pick out girls online and send them unsolicited messages.

Social media platforms are failing to protect women and girls from harm, new research reveals

Peter Kyle leaves 10 Downing Street, London

Government-built AI tool used to cut admin work for human staff

In its last reported annual headcount in June 2024, Microsoft employed 228,000 full-time workers

Microsoft axes 6,000 jobs despite strong profits in recent quarters

Airbnb logo

Airbnb unveils revamp as it expands ‘beyond stays’ to challenge hotel sector

A car key on top of a Certificate of Motor Insurance and Policy Schedule

Drivers losing thousands to ghost broker scams – the red flags to watch out for

Marks and Spencer cyber attack

M&S customers urged to ‘stay vigilant’ for fraud after data breach confirmed